Good idea, but how do you then denazify them? There's way too many Nazis to just "cut them off", it'd be like living in a rural town without using a car.
Not to say that Nazis are good, but that's a primarily *defensive* tactic, where we should be using *offensive* tactics like propaganda and sabotage. You're not living in the America you knew. The enemy surrounds us entirely and we have to understand that.
No no no you don't understand. It's the cult of people who call anybody who does a weird salute or mildly dislikes Jewish people or brown people and wants to declassify women as people with rights as a Nazi. Don't you see it's both sides that are extremist. You're just giving in to left wing propaganda...
Which is why the right has been vilifying the term antifa for the last 6-8 years. That way they can be primed to kill anti-fascists without having to admit to themselves that it means they’re fascist.
I’m a little worried about the distraction this is causing, distraction away from taking real action that can help. Like, felon and nazi are real and useful predictive attributes, but we kind of already knew some of that.
I feel like a better focus would be on taking action - donation, volunteerism, things your class valedictorian would do - to counter actual harmful or evil changes that are made in actual legislation. It sucks to have to prop up things that make America *actually* great ourselves because narrow minded politicians cut public funding. But to keep these things alive, we have to step up.
We already made our predictions known. Deep down we already know this isn’t convincing anybody new. The next step is taking action. Local non-profits want to hear from you. If it’s a cause that you think might be threatened, and you care about it, you might be able to help.
Who amongst us hasn't mistakenly made what looks like a Nazi salute, twice, in front of a crowd whilst doing a speech, been wrongfully interpreted as an AfD supporter after having said "I support the AfD" or made posts claiming that Jews do bad things which were unfairly seen as antisemitic?
I don't know where you got that opinion from. An echo chamber is an echo chamber and I think it's a shame regardless of which flavour it is.
I'm here for open debate and freedom of expression, knowing that will mean having to see and read things I don't like every now and again.
If other people want to block other users up to the point there's no one else that has a different opinion to them, then they absolutely can do that but I thinks it's just being an ostrich that sticks it's head in the sand.
Enjoy your echo chamber, must be nice when there’s no-one that has a different opinion or disagrees with you.
So how I feel about this depends somewhat on which platform I'm on, but why do some try to paint it as a virtue to allow ourselves to be surrounded by toxicity?
I can be aware of what is happening in the world and engaged with people who have different opinions than I have without having to let them pollute the places where I just want to be able to exist without harassment and assholery. I can also make different decisions about how insular I want to be on one platform vs another. I don't have to let those people into my life, and I frankly find it kind of offensive when folks suggest that I or others are somehow missing out by not letting them in.
No one should feel obligated to let themselves be the target of hateful rhetoric or comments that hurt them or bring negativity into their lives. Choosing to allow that is a valid choice, but it's not necessarily a healthy one, and choosing not to allow it is a reasonable choice for people to make for themselves for the sake of their own health or happiness.
I agree that there is a huge difference between blocking hate (who the site should be blocking anyway due to breaching the community guidelines) and blocking someone you simply disagree with or are offended by.
When it comes to being offended it's different, we can all agree that hate shouldn't be tolerated, but offence is in the eye of the beholder.
I could block any users that I find to be offensive and live in a lovely online community where everyone agrees with me but I personally don't want a community that doesn't reflect the real world and I find it mentally unhealthy to pretend that offensive people and/or people with different points of view don't exist.
"You just don't like people with different opinions about what types of humans should be eradicated. Not me, willing to have all sorts of conversations about ranking people in terms of who is subhuman."
I think there's a difference between blocking people that use hate speech and blocking those who you simply disagree with but I don't know why I keep bothering to try explaining myself.
Well, go do something about the Nazis and people will stop talking about them. If you want a feed to the world outside of your head, thay means dealing what what everyone else is talking about.
You can always just go jerk off in the shower and STFU about it
Sorry, but red shirt does have a point. People have been called a Nazi so many times because of small disagreements that now that we have musk make heil hitler signs, people actually wonder if he's really a neo nazi or not.
People should keep the "nazi" label for the real assholes
Red shirt needs merely to turn around and see the brown shirt with the swastika. There isn't a lot of grey area for interpretation of this comic, the artist is being very clear.
Unless you're talking about a version of the story where there really were wolves every time he cried wolf and nobody believed him until the wolves were eating people.
Mostly what I see are pedants who keep arguing that actually it's a coyote circling the chickens, and that calling it a wolf de-legitimizes actually crying wolf, and that wolves had a very specific platform, and all the while the coyote is getting closer to the fucking henhouse.
why has the "n" word never lost its strength as an oppressive word?
Tbf, it has to an extent, hence the "A" VS "hard R" distinction. The power was taken back as they say through repeated usage, some would call overuse, by the community who is allowed to say it. Other communities still aren't allowed to say it sure, but it did contextually lose power through overuse.
Do you think it plausible that actual white supremacist Neo Nazis might call other people Nazis, despite being fully aware that they are not, simply to further muddle the issue? A sort of, "I know you are, but what am I?" defense, that most of us master somewhere in early childhood?
Yeah I get that they would try to make noise to hide in. But I imagine that is not the majority of cases where someone is labeled as a nazi. Note this was from 2010, long before Trump entered politics.
And this isn't to say I like, support or side with them it's just people ignore the term after a while of hearing it everywhere for all kinds of things that don't fit
If people have been previously calling other people nazis excessively (i have seen people call a huge part of lemmy fascists), it doesnt mean anything the next time someone says there is a nazi
I know, it's the response from red shirt. He doesn't listen to the guy calling out the nazi, explaining how it's probably just overexaggeration.
It's similar to the ending of the boy who cried wolf. It's not that most people like wolves, or side with wolves, or think wolves aren't a threat. It's the person that that yells wolf is ignored when the real deal comes around.
I don't like nazis. At all. But there is certainly an argument that the term had been used too loosely (I was just called one in this comment section ffs) and now people are making nazi salutes in DC and are being ignored.
Jon Stewart called out the dilution of labels like racist etc in his closing speech of the 2010 Rally to Restore Sanity. It was a problem all the way back then.
By the time you started yelling about the real dangers, the boy who cried first had already came and went. The sheep were fine. The boy grew up, got a decent paying job amd moved out of the state. Another boy came by yelling the same thing. Still no wolves. Sheep still fine. Repeat more times than you can count.
It's not your fault, but it's stupid as hell to pretend that people *didn't* start taking those labels less seriously due to overuse.
No we all said watch the fuck out the nazis are buying up everything and even wrote a nazi playbook. The fuckin wolf was real all along. Fucking morons just decided to ignore. The boy lied in the story. He didn't lie here.
You *personally*? Sure. But there have been people online misusing the word (and similar things) for *fucking ages*, going back at least as far as 2010.
This goes back a lot farther than the last election campaign, farther back than Trump's first "reign", farther back than his first campaign even.
Background on Jon Stewart for those unaware of him
Jon Stewart has been out of the public eye for a long time, so I expect there's some people around unaware of his work. Did a comedy news show for years where he tore into the bullshit going on in the world, in the news, and in news orgs like Fox hiding behind a false "both sides" narrative back when they still cared enough to fake it. He got Crossfire cancelled when they were stupid enough to invite him on for an interview and were shocked that he wasn't willing to be a comedian on a show that claimed to be real news and he instead systematically and thoroughly called them out as the travesty they were.
Jon Fucking Stewart called out the dilution of labels through overuse in his closing speech at the Rally to Restore Sanity in 2010. The rally done as a reaction to the Tea Party rally in D.C.
That is to highlight that the "boy who cried wolf" shit was happening all the way back then and was already a big problem.
"If we amplify everything we hear nothing. There are terrorists and racists and Stalinists and theocrats but those are titles that must be earned. You must have the resume. Not being able to distinguish between real racists and Tea Partiers or real bigots and Juan Williams and Rick Sanchez is an insult, not only to those people but to the racists themselves who have put in the exhausting effort it takes to hate--just as the inability to distinguish terrorists from Muslims makes us less safe not more. The press is our immune system. If we overreact to everything we actually get sicker--and perhaps eczema."
People didn't get the fucking message, which gave cover for the real racists and nazis to slither around and significantly helped to get us where we are today.
Where an over rich manchild clearly on some sort of *substances* can give two half assed sieg heils, and then follow it up with the most half assed excuse during a fucking presidential inauguration and instead of being tackled by security and hauled the fuck off never to be seen again, people are sitting around giving him the benefit of the doubt.
This people we said where moving towards nazism are now doing Nazi salutes.
Clearly it is our fault for being smart enough to see what was happening and sounding the alarm!
It's take a true smooth brain to always find the way to blame the intellectuals for their own abhorent behavior.
I'm guessing the next stage here is blaming us for why you and them became Nazi. We clearly gave you no other choice. You and them are the real victims here.
Someone who got dangerously close to winning an election claimed the founder of a fascist party and a fascist dictator (both helped cause the Holocaust in Romania ) were national heroes
A nazi salute would be a step backwards. We are already there
No, he's still wrong. Even if he has been conditioned to ignore the term because of overuse of the term, he's still wrong.
The people who ignored the boy the third time he cried wolf were wrong. The proof they were wrong is that they lost their sheep. The moral of the story isn't "don't listen when little boys cry wolf three times and the first two times turn out to be false." The moral is "don't cry wolf when there is no wolf or people will stop listening to you."
So you can argue that the people who conditioned red shirt not too look were wrong, i.e. "the boy who cried Nazi", but in this case red shirt is most definitely wrong.
Yeah. I'm ignoring the strawman part of the argument that the people calling wolf for the past 80 years were always lying, since it doesn't affect red shirt's wrongness.
That is exactly what I am trying to convey, thank you.
Red shirt is wrong for ignoring the pointing person. The person pointing out the nazi is right. I am trying to argue that the person pointing out the nazi and the people who conditioned red shirt to the point of ignoring a legitimate cry are not the same and ultimately did not help things.
Crying wolf...again. The guy in the comic has to specify "literally a nazi" because using the regular word's meaning has been diluted so he has to put emphasis to specify it's a "true" nazi, not just a "vague" nazi.
Yes it's frustrating red shirt won't turn around to see that it is in fact a true, no shit, actual, factual, punchable, dictionary definition of a nazi but that's because the word has been overused. Your reply is proof.
It hasn't lost its effect. It never had an effect to begin with on the people that this cunt was sieg heiling because they are happy to downplay the very real and very obvious fascist elements of the American right. Saying the word Nazi has lost its effect makes this sound like the issue is one of semantics, as though if that word hadn't (wholly and justifiably) been used so much in recent decades that people would now wake up and go, 'Oh fuck, this guy is actually really bad'. But they wouldn't. Because fascists don't think other fascists are bad.
The joke is exactly that the "argument" you're using has been abused to such a point by American "centrists" and the even more far right types that per their definition the only possible way to be a Nazi is to have been a member of the National Socialist Party Of The German Worker during the period when it was committing the Holocaust.
You saw a lot of this shit from, for example, supporters of Zionism, and now you're seeing an even more ridiculous version of it from far-right muppets trying to excuse Elon's looks-like-Hitler's repeated salute as not Nazi.
Normal people who are not arguing in bad faith will have a definition for the threshold of when a person, party or nation's actions might be considered as Nazism which is far less restricted than "only those who were the murderers in the Holocaust qualify".
JollyPieFed
Deleted by author
He's just into war reenactment and also expressing that his heart went out to him (/s).
That cold, shriveled, thorny accessory organ flew across the room at match speed and took someone's eye out.
This kind of reminds me of this old skit https://youtu.be/PxS1H7oqrSI?si=hHKwrRw3q4E5QmXA
Normalizing fascism.
The sooner we accept we've reached that stage, the sooner we can do something about it.
I'm not holding my breath.
Start calling them Nazis and Nazi sympathizers, to start.
Honestly, the simple act of doing that has calmed a lot of the dissonance in my brain.
Intentional Stonetoss expression at the end?
I was thinking the same thing
I'm glad I'm not the only one! It's so good!
Right? The guy's nose disappears, it's gotta be intentional
This is every fucking conversation I have with my right leaning friends at this point.
Cut them off.
Good idea, but how do you then denazify them? There's way too many Nazis to just "cut them off", it'd be like living in a rural town without using a car.
Not to say that Nazis are good, but that's a primarily *defensive* tactic, where we should be using *offensive* tactics like propaganda and sabotage. You're not living in the America you knew. The enemy surrounds us entirely and we have to understand that.
Please yes, isolate yourself for the cult
The cult of... Anti-nazis?
Genius.
No no no you don't understand. It's the cult of people who call anybody who does a weird salute or mildly dislikes Jewish people or brown people and wants to declassify women as people with rights as a Nazi. Don't you see it's both sides that are extremist. You're just giving in to left wing propaganda...
~the centrist point of view
I mean really they are all fascists so really it would be some kind of anti-fascist movement.
🤔
Which is why the right has been vilifying the term antifa for the last 6-8 years. That way they can be primed to kill anti-fascists without having to admit to themselves that it means they’re fascist.
Deleted by author
It was literally the nazis who got centrists to "water-down" the word nazi.
They’re still working on it.
Deleted by author
Same, I saw the still image and thought, "oh this is like where they grab a still of them waving then are like 'look! Obama doing the Nazi salute!'"
Nope. Video was one of the most emphatic Nazi salutes I've ever seen. Twice!
I’m a little worried about the distraction this is causing, distraction away from taking real action that can help. Like, felon and nazi are real and useful predictive attributes, but we kind of already knew some of that.
I feel like a better focus would be on taking action - donation, volunteerism, things your class valedictorian would do - to counter actual harmful or evil changes that are made in actual legislation. It sucks to have to prop up things that make America *actually* great ourselves because narrow minded politicians cut public funding. But to keep these things alive, we have to step up.
We already made our predictions known. Deep down we already know this isn’t convincing anybody new. The next step is taking action. Local non-profits want to hear from you. If it’s a cause that you think might be threatened, and you care about it, you might be able to help.
There was no way we could tell he was a Nazi 😔
Who amongst us hasn't mistakenly made what looks like a Nazi salute, twice, in front of a crowd whilst doing a speech, been wrongfully interpreted as an AfD supporter after having said "I support the AfD" or made posts claiming that Jews do bad things which were unfairly seen as antisemitic?
It could happen to anybody!
/s
Gentlemen gentlemen that's just a actor on his way to a show.
My Lemmy blocklist has literally tripled since yesterday lol.
If we keep going, we can make this an echo chamber yet!
Are we all still referring to the comic strip about Nazis?
Kinda weird that its only an echo chamber when it leaves out the right.
I don't know where you got that opinion from. An echo chamber is an echo chamber and I think it's a shame regardless of which flavour it is.
I'm here for open debate and freedom of expression, knowing that will mean having to see and read things I don't like every now and again.
If other people want to block other users up to the point there's no one else that has a different opinion to them, then they absolutely can do that but I thinks it's just being an ostrich that sticks it's head in the sand.
Enlightened centrist?
Someone with the privilege of not belonging to a group that fascists wants to exterminate from the planet, apparently.
I consider my self a lefty, but I think it's important to consider all points of view, especially when I disagree with them.
Aaaand blocked. Keep fellating Trump and Musk
I don't like Trump or Musk, I just keep my head when all else about are losing theirs.
Enjoy your echo chamber, must be nice when there's no-one that has a different opinion or disagrees with you.
So how I feel about this depends somewhat on which platform I'm on, but why do some try to paint it as a virtue to allow ourselves to be surrounded by toxicity?
I can be aware of what is happening in the world and engaged with people who have different opinions than I have without having to let them pollute the places where I just want to be able to exist without harassment and assholery. I can also make different decisions about how insular I want to be on one platform vs another. I don't have to let those people into my life, and I frankly find it kind of offensive when folks suggest that I or others are somehow missing out by not letting them in.
No one should feel obligated to let themselves be the target of hateful rhetoric or comments that hurt them or bring negativity into their lives. Choosing to allow that is a valid choice, but it's not necessarily a healthy one, and choosing not to allow it is a reasonable choice for people to make for themselves for the sake of their own health or happiness.
I agree that there is a huge difference between blocking hate (who the site should be blocking anyway due to breaching the community guidelines) and blocking someone you simply disagree with or are offended by.
When it comes to being offended it's different, we can all agree that hate shouldn't be tolerated, but offence is in the eye of the beholder.
I could block any users that I find to be offensive and live in a lovely online community where everyone agrees with me but I personally don't want a community that doesn't reflect the real world and I find it mentally unhealthy to pretend that offensive people and/or people with different points of view don't exist.
"You just don't like people with different opinions about what types of humans should be eradicated. Not me, willing to have all sorts of conversations about ranking people in terms of who is subhuman."
I think there's a difference between blocking people that use hate speech and blocking those who you simply disagree with but I don't know why I keep bothering to try explaining myself.
Turns out he was just playing in a WWII movie
A production of The Producers. Singing Springtime for Hitler.
what does this guy have against nazi's?
He can nazi what the other guy's saying.
ah bc he hates jews
The nazi's *what*?
that's what
Meanwhile bro on his way to a reenactment of The producers: Springtime for Hitler: The musical
Deleted by author
Well, go do something about the Nazis and people will stop talking about them. If you want a feed to the world outside of your head, thay means dealing what what everyone else is talking about.
You can always just go jerk off in the shower and STFU about it
Deleted by author
Yeah, it's almost like this isn't about you. It's almost like it's about a major world power openly embracing fascism and neo nazis.
Get off the internet if it bothers you.
Found the 1930s era German that said "it is what it is".
I'm sorry, we're you in DC this week knocking down the white house doors and throwing molotovs?
Right. Shut up. You ain't doing jack shit either.
Discussion raises awareness. Awareness leads to action.
At least I'm not some loser entirely unaware of what's happening.
Nope. You're just a douchebag.
Sometimes I can't understand why I'm so joyless and cynical, then I read some of the comments on Lemmy and feel a lot better about myself!
Deleted by author
Deleted by author
Sorry, but red shirt does have a point. People have been called a Nazi so many times because of small disagreements that now that we have musk make heil hitler signs, people actually wonder if he's really a neo nazi or not.
People should keep the "nazi" label for the real assholes
Red shirt needs merely to turn around and see the brown shirt with the swastika. There isn't a lot of grey area for interpretation of this comic, the artist is being very clear.
This isn't the same as The Boy Who Cried Wolf.
Unless you're talking about a version of the story where there really were wolves every time he cried wolf and nobody believed him until the wolves were eating people.
Still not a perfect analogy but much closer.
Voicing concerns as the republicans slowly claimed their way towards fascism is not the same as an imagined wolf.
The allegory would be watching a wolf circle the chickens but idiots dismissing it because then wolf hasn't killed any chickens yet.
But that didn't work as well for wolf sympathizer like you.
Mostly what I see are pedants who keep arguing that actually it's a coyote circling the chickens, and that calling it a wolf de-legitimizes actually crying wolf, and that wolves had a very specific platform, and all the while the coyote is getting closer to the fucking henhouse.
Deleted by author
Tbf, it has to an extent, hence the "A" VS "hard R" distinction. The power was taken back as they say through repeated usage, some would call overuse, by the community who is allowed to say it. Other communities still aren't allowed to say it sure, but it did contextually lose power through overuse.
Deleted by author
You don't know if I'm allowed to or not. Oh wait I forgot everyone on the internet is a white american man, right?
Deleted by author
Shut up Nazi
Exactly, thanks for the great example
Exactly. Nazi. Shut up.
Fuck you Nazi
Ah. The crybaby is upset he got served a warm glass of shit the fuck up. I'm so sorry. I have no idea how I'm going to recover from not caring.
Isnt that sam smith's song? Dancing with a nazi
It's sad but he's not wrong. Nazi has been used on so many people I've lost count and people wonder why it has lost effect
Do you think it plausible that actual white supremacist Neo Nazis might call other people Nazis, despite being fully aware that they are not, simply to further muddle the issue? A sort of, "I know you are, but what am I?" defense, that most of us master somewhere in early childhood?
Yeah I get that they would try to make noise to hide in. But I imagine that is not the majority of cases where someone is labeled as a nazi. Note this was from 2010, long before Trump entered politics.
And this isn't to say I like, support or side with them it's just people ignore the term after a while of hearing it everywhere for all kinds of things that don't fit
The image depicts a guy in a nazi unform, doing a nazi salute. It's a nazi.
If people have been previously calling other people nazis excessively (i have seen people call a huge part of lemmy fascists), it doesnt mean anything the next time someone says there is a nazi
I know, it's the response from red shirt. He doesn't listen to the guy calling out the nazi, explaining how it's probably just overexaggeration.
It's similar to the ending of the boy who cried wolf. It's not that most people like wolves, or side with wolves, or think wolves aren't a threat. It's the person that that yells wolf is ignored when the real deal comes around.
I don't like nazis. At all. But there is certainly an argument that the term had been used too loosely (I was just called one in this comment section ffs) and now people are making nazi salutes in DC and are being ignored.
This isn't a case of the boy crying wolf. You fucks have been warned and have ignored the warnings. Now here we are.
Jon Stewart called out the dilution of labels like racist etc in his closing speech of the 2010 Rally to Restore Sanity. It was a problem all the way back then.
By the time you started yelling about the real dangers, the boy who cried first had already came and went. The sheep were fine. The boy grew up, got a decent paying job amd moved out of the state. Another boy came by yelling the same thing. Still no wolves. Sheep still fine. Repeat more times than you can count.
It's not your fault, but it's stupid as hell to pretend that people *didn't* start taking those labels less seriously due to overuse.
What about people calling anyone who disagrees with them or any mod that bans them nazis?
Usually theyre right
No we all said watch the fuck out the nazis are buying up everything and even wrote a nazi playbook. The fuckin wolf was real all along. Fucking morons just decided to ignore. The boy lied in the story. He didn't lie here.
You *personally*? Sure. But there have been people online misusing the word (and similar things) for *fucking ages*, going back at least as far as 2010.
This goes back a lot farther than the last election campaign, farther back than Trump's first "reign", farther back than his first campaign even.
Background on Jon Stewart for those unaware of him
Jon Stewart has been out of the public eye for a long time, so I expect there's some people around unaware of his work. Did a comedy news show for years where he tore into the bullshit going on in the world, in the news, and in news orgs like Fox hiding behind a false "both sides" narrative back when they still cared enough to fake it. He got Crossfire cancelled when they were stupid enough to invite him on for an interview and were shocked that he wasn't willing to be a comedian on a show that claimed to be real news and he instead systematically and thoroughly called them out as the travesty they were.
Jon Fucking Stewart called out the dilution of labels through overuse in his closing speech at the Rally to Restore Sanity in 2010. The rally done as a reaction to the Tea Party rally in D.C.
That is to highlight that the "boy who cried wolf" shit was happening all the way back then and was already a big problem.
People didn't get the fucking message, which gave cover for the real racists and nazis to slither around and significantly helped to get us where we are today.
Where an over rich manchild clearly on some sort of *substances* can give two half assed sieg heils, and then follow it up with the most half assed excuse during a fucking presidential inauguration and instead of being tackled by security and hauled the fuck off never to be seen again, people are sitting around giving him the benefit of the doubt.
Nazis, fascists, ect were a problem as early as 2010. All the people who are doing nazi shit now, i grew up with them, they were always like that
You were called a nazi because its 36 and youre waffling about what is and isnt a nazi
Not only that, but the guy wearing the uniform (god knows what for) is talking to someone. Presumably a friend, which means he is also a Nazi!
The guy being warned over? Also a Nazi!
The guy warning the other? Also a Nazi for not stepping up and actually doing something!
The guy drawing attention and propaganda to the Nazis through rendering in comic form? You guessed it, also a Nazi!
The guy sharing said propaganda here? Also a Nazi!
The ones discussing it instead of actually doing something about it? Nazis as well.
The mods that allowed it on Lemmy? Bunch of Nazis!
I'd continue but I am willing to bet you did not see that coming
This people we said where moving towards nazism are now doing Nazi salutes.
Clearly it is our fault for being smart enough to see what was happening and sounding the alarm!
It's take a true smooth brain to always find the way to blame the intellectuals for their own abhorent behavior.
I'm guessing the next stage here is blaming us for why you and them became Nazi. We clearly gave you no other choice. You and them are the real victims here.
Moving towards nazisn?
Someone who got dangerously close to winning an election claimed the founder of a fascist party and a fascist dictator (both helped cause the Holocaust in Romania ) were national heroes
A nazi salute would be a step backwards. We are already there
No, he's still wrong. Even if he has been conditioned to ignore the term because of overuse of the term, he's still wrong.
The people who ignored the boy the third time he cried wolf were wrong. The proof they were wrong is that they lost their sheep. The moral of the story isn't "don't listen when little boys cry wolf three times and the first two times turn out to be false." The moral is "don't cry wolf when there is no wolf or people will stop listening to you."
So you can argue that the people who conditioned red shirt not too look were wrong, i.e. "the boy who cried Nazi", but in this case red shirt is most definitely wrong.
Except there were wolves the whole time. Tf does the boy do when there is actually a wolf the whole time and noone believes him?
Yeah. I'm ignoring the strawman part of the argument that the people calling wolf for the past 80 years were always lying, since it doesn't affect red shirt's wrongness.
That is exactly what I am trying to convey, thank you.
Red shirt is wrong for ignoring the pointing person. The person pointing out the nazi is right. I am trying to argue that the person pointing out the nazi and the people who conditioned red shirt to the point of ignoring a legitimate cry are not the same and ultimately did not help things.
Bullshit. We've been calling so many people Nazis precisely because they actually turned out to be Nazis. Every single fucking one of them.
If you didn't see it, it's because you were deliberately turning a blind eye.
Found the Nazi
Proof? Or is disagreement with you enough?
Crying wolf...again. The guy in the comic has to specify "literally a nazi" because using the regular word's meaning has been diluted so he has to put emphasis to specify it's a "true" nazi, not just a "vague" nazi.
Yes it's frustrating red shirt won't turn around to see that it is in fact a true, no shit, actual, factual, punchable, dictionary definition of a nazi but that's because the word has been overused. Your reply is proof.
Deleted by moderator
It hasn't lost its effect. It never had an effect to begin with on the people that this cunt was sieg heiling because they are happy to downplay the very real and very obvious fascist elements of the American right. Saying the word Nazi has lost its effect makes this sound like the issue is one of semantics, as though if that word hadn't (wholly and justifiably) been used so much in recent decades that people would now wake up and go, 'Oh fuck, this guy is actually really bad'. But they wouldn't. Because fascists don't think other fascists are bad.
The joke is exactly that the "argument" you're using has been abused to such a point by American "centrists" and the even more far right types that per their definition the only possible way to be a Nazi is to have been a member of the National Socialist Party Of The German Worker during the period when it was committing the Holocaust.
You saw a lot of this shit from, for example, supporters of Zionism, and now you're seeing an even more ridiculous version of it from far-right muppets trying to excuse Elon's looks-like-Hitler's repeated salute as not Nazi.
Normal people who are not arguing in bad faith will have a definition for the threshold of when a person, party or nation's actions might be considered as Nazism which is far less restricted than "only those who were the murderers in the Holocaust qualify".
That guy doesn't look like Joe Biden
There's always that one commenter, eh.